NIH scientist questions mandate ethics. FDA releases safety data (it’s startling). AHA issues warning (it’s censored).
An NIH scientist questioned the ethics of mandates. The FDA’s bid to keep safety documents sealed for 55 years failed. The American Heart Association issued a warning; Twitter flagged it as unsafe.
The news cycle moves so quickly that sometimes it’s difficult to keep track of all of it, but there are three big stories regarding “vaccines” that emerged recently, and they all back those who are balking at getting the jab.
At least one scientist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is questioning the ethics of mandating vaccines for all but the most vulnerable. Despite the FDA’s original request to seal documents for 55 years regarding the jab’s safety, a judge ordered the release of 38 pages of the 300,000+ it has. Considering what was revealed, no wonder they wanted it hidden. They have since requested 75 years to roll out the information at 500 pages per month. Then there’s the American Heart Association. It released a study that warned against rising cases of heart conditions associated with the vax, despite efforts by corporate media to make people think it’s related to stress from the pandemic and smoking pot, among other things.
Dr. Matthew Memoli, the director of the laboratory for infectious diseases at the NIH (who will not be getting the Covid-19 injections), made his case before a panel of NIH colleagues on December 1, complete with data to support his claims. He concludes that all but the most vulnerable — people over 70 years old and those with co-morbidities — should not be mandated to get the jab.
Memoli said before removing the rights of people to choose whether they should get the jab there should be three considerations. He focuses on safety and efficacy.
Memoli said the effectiveness of the shot starts to wane after two months and is completely feckless after seven.
One of the NIH’s very own scientists admits that those who are vaccinated could make transmission worse. They carry the same viral load as those who are infected and aren’t vaccinated, but because they aren’t feeling sick, they go into their communities, spreading the virus wherever they go.
Safe? Memoli points out the staggering number of Adverse Events (AEs) and deaths compared to flu shots, of which more than twice as many have been administered. This is why people are reluctant to get the jab — they’ve done their research.
Below is Memoli’s presentation. The entire panel discussion is here.
Augmenting Memoli’s case (besides many studies, including this, this, this and this) is the tranche of documents released by the FDA. This group of 38 pages was damaging to the FDA’s case for approval of the vax. No wonder they now want 75 years to roll it out.
There were fewer than 100 deaths when the FDA shut down the Swine Flu vaccination program. The data set above is only for the first two months the shot was rolled out from December 2020 to February 2021.
Even the medical journal The Lancet is chastising “high-level officials” for shaming unvaccinated people.
When people tweeted the American Heart Association’s latest study, which concludes the vaccine increases the risk of heart diseases, Twitter censored it and labeled the link as “unsafe.” Click on the image below and then click on the link to the study in the tweet.
Those of you who are wondering why fact-checkers censor bonafide stats and data regarding the jab, let me draw your attention to Reuters. The current chair of the Thompson Reuters Foundation, who retired as CEO of Thompson Reuters in 2020, is James C. Smith. He is both a top investor and board member of Pfizer.
Let me remind you of Pfizer’s criminal record regarding marketing. From the Department of Justice on September 2, 2009:
American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together “Pfizer”) have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.
Despite the huge fine, nobody served any time behind bars for the company’s criminal behavior. If you’d like to see the history of Pfizer’s criminal acts and fines, along with some of the actors who’ve participated in them, check out this substack.
For the latest information about the jabs, visit this comprehensive site, and remember the information shared about Reuters above.
Perhaps medical professionals and others who push the shot are ignorant of these facts, but most are looking the other way. Despite the mounting evidence, they have the audacity and arrogance to call “anti-vaxxers” uneducated, selfish, uncaring, ad hominem, ad hominem. It’s absolute projection. For those of you who are wavering, do not compromise. Truth will prevail.
13 Be on your guard; stand firm in the faith; be courageous; be strong. 14 Do everything in love. 1 Corinthians 16:13-14